I was caught in mixed feelings
after reading both of this weeks papers.
Moore employed the use of methylazoxymethanol, a neurotoxin, to model
symptoms of schizophrenia, while Kellendonk focused on manipulating an over
expression of D2 receptors in the striatum.
The use of MAM to induce schizophrenia like morphological changes and
behavioral pathologies seems a little rudimentary in approaching an animal
model of the disorder. Although the following
studies revealed a wide scope of observations, including morphologically
relevant discrepancies from a control, the context specific impacts seemed to
be too selective to warrant a more generalized application to
schizophrenia. A strong point of the
Moore paper however, was the focus on E15 versus E17 stages of MAM administration
and the subsequent differences in schizophrenia related effects. This both showed that schizophrenia does have
roots in developmental stages and exposed MAM to have a temporal dependency as
a mimicking agent of the disorder. This
type of limitation is crucial to understanding the extent of which a single
variable is in constant battle with confounding variables when under going such
testing.
The Kellendonk paper sat a little better
with me as I felt they confronted their limitations head on and made sure to
convey their results very honestly and in light of their shortcomings. Their pursuit to me also seemed more
reasonable, a focus specifically on the cognitive symptoms due to up regulation
of receptors as opposed to the broad-spectrum approach Moore took. Regarding
their actual results, it was clear that D2 receptor up regulation in the
striatum impacted dopamine levels and more specifically dopamine turnover rates
in the prefrontal cortex. There were
observed impairments in working memory tasks and other behavioral tests but
none that relied on continued expression of the excess receptor, which brought
back the significance of a critical developmental window in the manifestation
of the disorder. By the end of the
Kellendonk paper, I was convinced that the striatum D2 receptor to prefrontal
cortex D1 receptors relationship deserved more experimentation in creating a
working animal model of schizophrenia.
No comments:
Post a Comment