The article by Herry et al. was a
bit confusing for me. After spending time with it, it made sense for the most
part, however, there we parts that I could not figure out. Some of the
behavioral paradigms didn’t make much sense to me and it was difficult for me
to see why they set up the experiments the way they did, especially with very
little information explaining in the text. Despite this, I found the article
interesting, yet not completely convincing. I believe this is mostly due to the
fact that I had trouble wrapping my mind around some things, but I feel they
may have made some chancy claims. They said that they demonstrated the reversal
of “…fear-conditioning-induced behavioural discrimination between the CS+ and
the CS-,…”, but the frequency of the neurons in Figure 1d did not return to
base level. In this case, they only saw the disappearance of a reaction to the
tone. This also makes me wonder why the neurons were more active in general
during extinction as compared to habituation.
I found the paper by Reznikov et
al. much more understandable. Though it’s possible that this is due to the fact
that I am more familiar with their methods and have experience reading this
type of study, they also seemed to make every effort to make their research
clear and extremely concise. Personally, I found the study very interesting and
was convinced by the end of the paper that there are most likely ways to
pre-determine rats that, when exposed to a stressful event, will be unable to
extinguish as well as counterparts. My one major question for the authors is
why they didn’t conduct behavioral tests in experiment 2 after conducting
fear-conditioning and extinction to compare the behavioral results to the ones
they got before. I think it’d be interesting to see if there were any
significant differences between strong-extinction rats before and after as well
as within group assessments for the weak-extinction rats and any interactions
between groups. In addition, I think it would be very interesting to see where
research in the field went/will go from here because I find the topic of
genetic predispositions to PTSD fascinating.
No comments:
Post a Comment