In the papers for this week,
Herry et. al (2008) focused on the populations of neurons that fire during fear
and extinction training while Reznikov et. al (2015) separated out rats that
failed to extinguish fear responses and then measured differences between these
two populations in both plasma corticosterone levels and behavioral tests. I
think the papers are focused on a common goal but they are very different.
Herry et. al (2008) use spike recordings from specific neurons in the
basolateral complex of the amygdala to show fear conditioning/extinction.
However, I am more interested in the paper by Reznikov et. al (2015) which aims
to create a better animal model of PTSD.
I found this paper especially
interesting because a lot of what we discuss in class seems to come back to
whether or not the models used in other papers are truly indicative of the
disorder. Reznikov et. al (2015) discussed the different methods that can be
used to induce PTSD symptoms, and they focused on the behavioral variation of
the animals, such that the percentage that developed negative behaviors long
term was comparable to the proportion of the human population that develops
PTSD. I thought that this, as well as separation into strong and weak
extinction categories, really validated the study with respect to improving the
model such that it is similar to the human model.
I thought that the weak and
strong extinction categorization was interesting because it accounted for
variability in reactions to traumatic stress, and Reznikov et. al (2015) were
able to show that there were significant differences in behavior and
corticosterone levels when the two levels of extinction were compared. I also
found it interesting that the differences in corticosterone were observed
before the fear conditioning, since that could be a predictive measure of PTSD
development. I think that this paper made a strong case for upgrading the animal
model of PTSD, and it would be interesting to see how/if Herry et. al (2008)
could change their study to fit a model that seems more representative of the
human presentation.
No comments:
Post a Comment