The paper this week
focused on how cocaine changed behavior in stressed and non-stressed rats of
both sexes. I found the premise of this study really interesting, because it
emphasized the sex differences particularly in terms of stress. In Figure 2,
Holly et. al (2012) show that stressed females in general have a longer walk
duration and thus greater behavioral sensitization to cocaine. Non-stressed females
in estrus showed an increase in walk duration after cocaine administration,
while only males who were stressed showed a short-term increase in
sensitization. These results are important because they demonstrate that
females have increased walking behavior and that cocaine causes longer lasting
effects in females than in males. I think this is extremely relevant for human
application, because it implies that females might be more vulnerable to
addictive drug sensitization, especially during menstruation.
Additionally, Holly
et. al (2012) found a large difference between males and females in terms of
dopaminergic sensitization in the nucleus accumbens. What particularly
interested me was that stressed females seemed to have a prolonged change in
dopamine, while males spiked to approximately the same level but returned to
baseline levels after ninety minutes. Holly et. al (2012) seemed think that the
reason for this was estradiol, but they weren’t very specific about which group
of females (estrus or diestrus) was used in Figure 4, though their explanation
indicates that it was likely estrus females. This is interesting, because the
authors noted no difference when they castrated males, indicating that either
the duration of dopamine change due to estradiol occurs only in females (as
they believe) or that there is an alternative that has yet to be determined.
In terms of both
binge infusion and duration stressed males and females binged more than
control, but females more so than males. I thought it was interesting that
stressed females had more infusions and a significantly longer duration than stressed
males, but there were no differences in non-stressed females, especially since
it again wasn’t clear as to whether the females were in estrus or diestrus. I
think it would be helpful in the future to run diestrus versus estrus tests and
show those results clearly, since I found the results in diestrus stressed females
Figure 2 (who had a higher walk duration after cocaine) intriguing. Overall, I think
that there is a lot of further research that could be done, and that the figures
should have been clearer since the authors originally split their rats into
three groups (male, female diestrus, and female estrus).
No comments:
Post a Comment