Animal Models of Depression/Antidepressants Response
Both of these papers agree that there is a change happening
with the neurons in rat animal models of depression as a result of introducing
antidepressants. However, where the papers stray from one another are the
mechanisms behind why antidepressants have been proven to effectively reduce
behavioral symptoms of depression in animal models. Santarelli et. al (2003) believe that neurogenesis
is the underlying cause of the effectiveness of antidepressants. However
through a variety of different experiments, Bessa et. al (2009) shows that the effectiveness of antidepressants is
due to the plasticity and changes in connectivity of the neurons. The
prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus have been highly associated with
depression, but as far as we know the prefrontal cortex does not have the
ability to generate new neurons after birth (Bessa et. al, 2009). Bessa et. al (2009) blocked neurogenesis by treating animals with MAM (mitosis-suppressing agent),
but the antidepressants were still effective for treating depressive behaviors
in MAM-treated animals as well as vehicle-treated animals. This finding
suggests that there must be another mechanism underlying the effectiveness of
antidepressants in treating depressive behaviors. After reading both of these
papers, I agree with Bessa et. al
(2009) that antidepressants cause plasticity and connectivity changes in the
neurons. However, I do think that this can be indirectly related to the
neurogenerative changes that Santarelli et
al. (2003) see in their experiments. As we know, fluoxetine is a selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), which means that it is binding to
presynaptic receptors on neurons to block serotonin from going back into the
presynaptic neuron. Therefore, it is making the serotonin stay in the synapse and
continue to bind to the postsynaptic neuron receptors causing the postsynaptic
receptors to eventually up-regulate, which also may account for the latency in
effectiveness of fluoxetine. The up-regulation of postsynaptic serotonin
receptors would be a plastic change of the neurons, therefore furthering Bessa et. al (2009) research. However, the
changes in the neurons and increase in activation of the neurons could lead to
more neurogenesis as well. In my opinion, I think these two phenomena are
probably closely related, however the connection may not be well understood.
No comments:
Post a Comment